SUṢAMĀ : Multidisciplinary Research Journal

Our journal follows a rigorous and impartial Peer Review process to ensure the high quality and credibility of the research we publish. We believe that a robust peer review is the cornerstone of academic publishing.

1.Initial Screening: Upon submission, the editorial team conducts an initial screening to check for the manuscript's suitability, language, and formatting. If the manuscript does not align with the journal's aims and scope, it may be rejected at this stage.

2.Reviewer Selection: If the manuscript passes the initial screening, the editor identifies and invites 2-3 expert peer reviewers based on the paper's subject matter. These reviewers are typically experienced researchers or scholars in the relevant field.

3.Review: The selected reviewers evaluate the manuscript thoroughly within a specified timeframe. Their evaluation includes, but is not limited to:

¨ Originality and significance of the research.

¨ Validity and transparency of the methodology.

¨ Accuracy of the findings and soundness of the conclusions.

¨ Clarity of writing and overall presentation.

4.Decision Making: Based on the reviewers' feedback, the editorial board makes a final decision. The decisions are typically one of four types:

¨ Accept: The manuscript is accepted for publication without any changes.

¨ Accept with Minor Revisions: The manuscript is accepted, pending small corrections.

¨ Resubmit with Major Revisions: The manuscript requires significant changes before it can be reconsidered.

¨ Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal.

5.Re-review: If revisions are required, the author is asked to amend the manuscript based on the feedback. The revised version may be sent back to the reviewers for re-evaluation or reviewed by the editor.

Our peer review process is Double-Blind, meaning the identities of both the author and the reviewers are kept confidential from each other. This ensures an unbiased and fair assessment.

Our goal is to assist authors in improving their research through a constructive and transparent process, while ensuring that our readers receive only the highest quality publications.